The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules
- Authors
- George L. Priest
- Journal
- The Journal of Legal Studies
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/467563 →Countries where authors are citing The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules
This map shows the geographic impact of The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules
This network shows the impact of The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules.
About The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules
This paper, published in 1977, received 277 indexed citations . Written by George L. Priest covering the research area of Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (199 citations), Law (108 citations) and Accounting (42 citations). Published in The Journal of Legal Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/467563.