The Biology of the Parasitic Wasp Mormoniella vitripennis [=Nasonia brevicornis] (Walker)
- Authors
- Anna R. Whiting
- Journal
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/405402 →Countries where authors are citing The Biology of the Parasitic Wasp Mormoniella vitripennis [=Nasonia brevicornis] (Walker)
This map shows the geographic impact of The Biology of the Parasitic Wasp Mormoniella vitripennis [=Nasonia brevicornis] (Walker). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Biology of the Parasitic Wasp Mormoniella vitripennis [=Nasonia brevicornis] (Walker) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Biology of the Parasitic Wasp Mormoniella vitripennis [=Nasonia brevicornis] (Walker) more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Biology of the Parasitic Wasp Mormoniella vitripennis [=Nasonia brevicornis] (Walker)
This network shows the impact of The Biology of the Parasitic Wasp Mormoniella vitripennis [=Nasonia brevicornis] (Walker). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Biology of the Parasitic Wasp Mormoniella vitripennis [=Nasonia brevicornis] (Walker).
About The Biology of the Parasitic Wasp Mormoniella vitripennis [=Nasonia brevicornis] (Walker)
This paper, published in 1967, received 273 indexed citations . Written by Anna R. Whiting covering the research area of Insect Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Insect Science (220 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (147 citations) and Genetics (125 citations). Published in The Quarterly Review of Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/405402.