The Tenuous Trade‐off between Risk and Incentives
- Authors
- Canice Prendergast
- Journal
- Journal of Political Economy
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/341874 →Countries where authors are citing The Tenuous Trade‐off between Risk and Incentives
This map shows the geographic impact of The Tenuous Trade‐off between Risk and Incentives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Tenuous Trade‐off between Risk and Incentives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Tenuous Trade‐off between Risk and Incentives more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Tenuous Trade‐off between Risk and Incentives
This network shows the impact of The Tenuous Trade‐off between Risk and Incentives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Tenuous Trade‐off between Risk and Incentives.
About The Tenuous Trade‐off between Risk and Incentives
This paper, published in 2002, received 700 indexed citations . Written by Canice Prendergast covering the research area of Accounting, Economics and Econometrics and Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Accounting (407 citations), Economics and Econometrics (320 citations) and Strategy and Management (177 citations). Published in Journal of Political Economy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/341874.