Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food
- Authors
- Angus DeatonChristina Paxson
- Journal
- Journal of Political Economy
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/250035 →Countries where authors are citing Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food
This map shows the geographic impact of Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food
This network shows the impact of Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food.
About Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food
This paper, published in 1998, received 335 indexed citations . Written by Angus Deaton and Christina Paxson covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (160 citations), Economics and Econometrics (150 citations) and Gender Studies (105 citations). Published in Journal of Political Economy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/250035.