Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods
- Journal
- American Journal of Sociology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/210356 →Countries where authors are citing Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods
This map shows the geographic impact of Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods
This network shows the impact of Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods.
About Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods
This paper, published in 1999, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Robert J. Sampson and Stephen W. Raudenbush covering the research area of General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (1.4k citations), General Health Professions (665 citations) and Health (398 citations). Published in American Journal of Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/210356.