The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount
- Sociology and Political Science
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Safety Research
- Authors
- Ezra W. Zuckerman
- Journal
- American Journal of Sociology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/210178 →Countries where authors are citing The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount
This map shows the geographic impact of The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount
This network shows the impact of The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount.
About The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount
This paper, published in 1999, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Ezra W. Zuckerman covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (568 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (521 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (392 citations). Published in American Journal of Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/210178.