A Naturalistic Inquiry into Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet
- Journal
- Journal of Consumer Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/209128 →Countries where authors are citing A Naturalistic Inquiry into Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet
This map shows the geographic impact of A Naturalistic Inquiry into Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Naturalistic Inquiry into Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Naturalistic Inquiry into Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Naturalistic Inquiry into Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet
This network shows the impact of A Naturalistic Inquiry into Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Naturalistic Inquiry into Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet.
About A Naturalistic Inquiry into Buyer and Seller Behavior at a Swap Meet
This paper, published in 1988, received 504 indexed citations . Written by Russell W. Belk, John F. Sherry and Melanie Wallendorf covering the research area of Marketing and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Marketing (332 citations), Sociology and Political Science (177 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (98 citations). Published in Journal of Consumer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/209128.