Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe
- Authors
- Verena Stölcke
- Journal
- Current Anthropology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/204339 →Countries where authors are citing Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe
This map shows the geographic impact of Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe
This network shows the impact of Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe.
About Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe
This paper, published in 1995, received 399 indexed citations . Written by Verena Stölcke covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (247 citations), Political Science and International Relations (107 citations) and Anthropology (65 citations). Published in Current Anthropology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/204339.