The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity

1.4k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2006, received 1.4k indexed citations. Written by María Hagströmer, Pekka Oja and Michael Sjöstróm covering the research area of Physiology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (576 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (487 citations) and General Health Professions (222 citations). Published in Public Health Nutrition.

Countries where authors are citing The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1079/phn2005898.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: Development and initial validation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3. Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper The genetics of inbreeding depression Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper TIME OF CONSCIOUS INTENTION TO ACT IN RELATION TO ONSET OF CEREBRAL ACTIVITY (READINESS-POTENTIAL) Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Microplastics: Finding a consensus on the definition Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Advanced Energy Storage Devices: Basic Principles, Analytical Methods, and Rational Materials Design Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016 Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Halogen bonds in biological molecules Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Algorithms, Analysis, and Applications Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Plasmacytoid dendritic cells sense self-DNA coupled with antimicrobial peptide
Rankless by CCL
2026