On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit
- Authors
- Huw C.W.L. Williams
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1068/a090285 →Countries where authors are citing On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit
This map shows the geographic impact of On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit
This network shows the impact of On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit.
About On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit
This paper, published in 1977, received 728 indexed citations . Written by Huw C.W.L. Williams covering the research area of Transportation and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Transportation (498 citations), Economics and Econometrics (383 citations) and Automotive Engineering (130 citations). Published in Environment and Planning A Economy and Space.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1068/a090285.