Signal transduction and endocytosis: close encounters of many kinds
- Authors
- Alexander SorkinMark von Zastrow
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nrm883 →Countries where authors are citing Signal transduction and endocytosis: close encounters of many kinds
This map shows the geographic impact of Signal transduction and endocytosis: close encounters of many kinds. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Signal transduction and endocytosis: close encounters of many kinds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Signal transduction and endocytosis: close encounters of many kinds more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Signal transduction and endocytosis: close encounters of many kinds
This network shows the impact of Signal transduction and endocytosis: close encounters of many kinds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Signal transduction and endocytosis: close encounters of many kinds.
About Signal transduction and endocytosis: close encounters of many kinds
This paper, published in 2002, received 689 indexed citations . Written by Alexander Sorkin and Mark von Zastrow covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Cell Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (488 citations), Cell Biology (274 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (98 citations). Published in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nrm883.