Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don't see)

928 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2014, received 928 indexed citations. Written by Ludger Klein, Bruno Kyewski, Paul M. Allen and Kristin A. Hogquist covering the research area of Immunology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Immunology (675 citations), Molecular Biology (228 citations) and Oncology (177 citations). Published in Nature reviews. Immunology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/nri3667 →

Countries where authors are citing Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don't see)

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don't see). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don't see) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don't see) more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don't see)

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don't see). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don't see).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nri3667.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026