Proteome-wide identification of ubiquitin interactions using UbIA-MS

437 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 437 indexed citations. Written by Xiao-Fei Zhang, Arne H. Smits, Huib Ovaa, Wolfgang Huber and Michiel Vermeulen covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (282 citations), Cell Biology (50 citations) and Immunology (43 citations). Published in Nature Protocols.

Countries where authors are citing Proteome-wide identification of ubiquitin interactions using UbIA-MS

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Proteome-wide identification of ubiquitin interactions using UbIA-MS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Proteome-wide identification of ubiquitin interactions using UbIA-MS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proteome-wide identification of ubiquitin interactions using UbIA-MS more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Proteome-wide identification of ubiquitin interactions using UbIA-MS

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Proteome-wide identification of ubiquitin interactions using UbIA-MS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Proteome-wide identification of ubiquitin interactions using UbIA-MS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.147.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026