Measurement of the spin-transfer-torque vector in magnetic tunnel junctions
- Journal
- Nature Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nphys783 →Countries where authors are citing Measurement of the spin-transfer-torque vector in magnetic tunnel junctions
This map shows the geographic impact of Measurement of the spin-transfer-torque vector in magnetic tunnel junctions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Measurement of the spin-transfer-torque vector in magnetic tunnel junctions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measurement of the spin-transfer-torque vector in magnetic tunnel junctions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Measurement of the spin-transfer-torque vector in magnetic tunnel junctions
This network shows the impact of Measurement of the spin-transfer-torque vector in magnetic tunnel junctions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Measurement of the spin-transfer-torque vector in magnetic tunnel junctions.
About Measurement of the spin-transfer-torque vector in magnetic tunnel junctions
This paper, published in 2007, received 501 indexed citations . Written by Jack C. Sankey, Yong‐Tao Cui, J. Z. Sun, J. C. Slonczewski, R. A. Buhrman and D. C. Ralph covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (466 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (224 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (155 citations). Published in Nature Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nphys783.