Synthetic gauge flux and Weyl points in acoustic systems
- Journal
- Nature Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nphys3458 →Countries where authors are citing Synthetic gauge flux and Weyl points in acoustic systems
This map shows the geographic impact of Synthetic gauge flux and Weyl points in acoustic systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Synthetic gauge flux and Weyl points in acoustic systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Synthetic gauge flux and Weyl points in acoustic systems more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Synthetic gauge flux and Weyl points in acoustic systems
This network shows the impact of Synthetic gauge flux and Weyl points in acoustic systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Synthetic gauge flux and Weyl points in acoustic systems.
About Synthetic gauge flux and Weyl points in acoustic systems
This paper, published in 2015, received 309 indexed citations . Written by Meng Xiao, Wen-Jie Chen, Wen‐Yu He and C. T. Chan covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (285 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (99 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (57 citations). Published in Nature Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nphys3458.