Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders
- Journal
- Nature Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nphys2998 →Countries where authors are citing Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders
This map shows the geographic impact of Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders
This network shows the impact of Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders.
About Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders
This paper, published in 2014, received 346 indexed citations . Written by Marcos Atala, Monika Aidelsburger, Michael Lohse, Julio T. Barreiro, Belén Paredes and Immanuel Bloch covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (345 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (96 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (40 citations). Published in Nature Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nphys2998.