Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions

1.4k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 1.4k indexed citations. Written by Stefan Heinze, Kirsten von Bergmann, Matthias Menzel, Jens Brede, André Kubetzka, R. Wiesendanger, Gustav Bihlmayer and Stefan Blügel covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.3k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (826 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (585 citations). Published in Nature Physics.

Countries where authors are citing Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nphys2045.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026