The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice
- Authors
- Joseph W. KablePaul W. Glimcher
- Journal
- Nature Neuroscience
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nn2007 →Countries where authors are citing The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice
This map shows the geographic impact of The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice
This network shows the impact of The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice.
About The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice
This paper, published in 2007, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Joseph W. Kable and Paul W. Glimcher covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Safety Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (983 citations), General Decision Sciences (520 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (278 citations). Published in Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nn2007.