Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship
- Journal
- Nature Methods
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nmeth758 →Countries where authors are citing Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship
This map shows the geographic impact of Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship
This network shows the impact of Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship.
About Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship
This paper, published in 2005, received 542 indexed citations . Written by Brent A. Reynolds and Rodney L. Rietze covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental Neuroscience (306 citations), Molecular Biology (301 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (132 citations). Published in Nature Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth758.