Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 918 indexed citations. Written by Stephanie S Lam, Jeffrey D. Martell, Kimberli J. Kamer, Thomas J. Deerinck, Mark H. Ellisman, Vamsi K. Mootha and Alice Y. Ting covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Cell Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (613 citations), Cell Biology (508 citations) and Organic Chemistry (177 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3179.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026