Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 701 indexed citations. Written by Teemu Kivioja, Anna Vähärautio, Kasper Karlsson, Martin Bonke, Martin Enge, Sten Linnarsson and Jussi Taipale covering the research area of Plant Science and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (550 citations), Cancer Research (207 citations) and Immunology (115 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1778.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026