Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse

1.0k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2010, received 1.0k indexed citations. Written by Dale J. Langford, Andrea Bailey, Mona Lisa Chanda, Sarah Glick, Joelle C. Ingrao, Michael L. LaCroix‐Fralish, Robert E. Sorge, Susana G. Sotocinal, Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg and Michel D. Ferrari covering the research area of Physiology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Small Animals (426 citations), Physiology (319 citations) and Genetics (145 citations). Published in Nature Methods.

Countries where authors are citing Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1455.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026