Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury
Abstract
loading...
About
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nm1618 →Countries where authors are citing Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury
This map shows the geographic impact of Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury
This network shows the impact of Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm1618.