Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 540 indexed citations. Written by Noemi Andor, Trevor A. Graham, Marnix Jansen, Xiaoling Zhang, Athena Aktipis, Claudia Petritsch, Hanlee P. Ji and Carlo C. Maley covering the research area of Cancer Research, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cancer Research (342 citations), Molecular Biology (232 citations) and Oncology (209 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/nm.3984 →

Countries where authors are citing Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm.3984.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026