Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 506 indexed citations. Written by Geicho Nakatsu, Xiangchun Li, Haokui Zhou, Jian-qiu Sheng, Sunny H. Wong, William Ka Kei Wu, Siew C. Ng, Ho Tsoi, Yujuan Dong and Ning Zhang covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Physiology and Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (404 citations), Oncology (218 citations) and Infectious Diseases (76 citations). Published in Nature Communications.

Countries where authors are citing Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9727.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026