Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology
- Journal
- Nature Biotechnology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/85686 →Countries where authors are citing Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology
This map shows the geographic impact of Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology
This network shows the impact of Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology.
About Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology
This paper, published in 2001, received 3.8k indexed citations . Written by Michael P. Washburn, Dirk Wolters and John R. Yates covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (2.8k citations), Spectroscopy (2.3k citations) and Cell Biology (267 citations). Published in Nature Biotechnology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/85686.