A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour
- Journal
- Nature Genetics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/75586 →Countries where authors are citing A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour
This map shows the geographic impact of A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour
This network shows the impact of A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour.
About A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour
This paper, published in 2000, received 442 indexed citations . Written by María C. Marín, Christine A. Jost, Louise Brooks, Meredith S. Irwin, Jenny O’Nions, John Tidy, Nicholas D. James, Jane McGregor, Catherine Harwood and Işık G. Yuluğ covering the research area of Oncology, Biotechnology and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (381 citations), Molecular Biology (292 citations) and Biotechnology (121 citations). Published in Nature Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/75586.