Louise Brooks

2.0k citations
21 papers · 1.5k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 16

Louise Brooks

21 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of m...4422000202620082017100200300400

Peers

Louise Brooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Oncology 968
  • Biotechnology 210
  • Dermatology 144
  • Cancer Research 231
  • Molecular Biology 827
Replace Timothy Crook with:
Timothy Crook United Kingdom
Elizabeth Livanos United States
Meera Patturajan United States
G A Niehans United States
Jean‐Marc Limacher France
Yoshinori Suminami Japan
Patrick A. Oberholzer Switzerland
J Y Ro United States
Bijay Mukherji United States
Sidney E. Chang United Kingdom
Louise Brooks relative to Timothy Crook United Kingdom Timothy Crook's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Timothy Crook · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Louise Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Louise Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louise Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louise Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Louise Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louise Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louise Brooks. The network helps show where Louise Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Louise Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Louise Brooks Line = papers co-authored together Louise Brooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Trends in ‘traditional apprenticeships’
20044
2
Australian vocational education and training statistics: trends in 'traditional apprenticeships'
20044
3 200277
4 200264
5 200286
6 200158
7 2000162
8
A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviourbreakdown →
2000442
9
Preferential retention of codon 72 arginine p53 in squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva occurs in cancers positive and negative for human papillomavirus.
200067
10 199960
11 199984
12 1998137
13 199780
14 199725
15 199433
16 199120
17 199023
18 19889
19 198849
20 19814

About Louise Brooks

Louise Brooks is a scholar working on Oncology, Biotechnology and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (6 papers), Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies (3 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (3 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (968 citations), Biotechnology (210 citations) and Dermatology (144 citations). Louise Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Tim Crook, Martin J. Allday, Jenny O’Nions, Barry A. Gusterson, Jane McGregor, John Tidy, Işık G. Yuluğ, María C. Marín, William G. Kaelin and Catherine Harwood. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Nature Genetics and Oncogene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026