Clinical applications of angiogenic growth factors and their inhibitors

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 834 indexed citations. Written by Napoleone Ferrara and Kari Alitalo covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (623 citations), Cancer Research (238 citations) and Oncology (197 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1038/70928 →

Countries where authors are citing Clinical applications of angiogenic growth factors and their inhibitors

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clinical applications of angiogenic growth factors and their inhibitors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinical applications of angiogenic growth factors and their inhibitors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical applications of angiogenic growth factors and their inhibitors more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Clinical applications of angiogenic growth factors and their inhibitors

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Clinical applications of angiogenic growth factors and their inhibitors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Clinical applications of angiogenic growth factors and their inhibitors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/70928.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026