Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/46035 →Countries where authors are citing Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex
This map shows the geographic impact of Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex
This network shows the impact of Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex.
About Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex
This paper, published in 1999, received 1.6k indexed citations . Written by Matthew Botvinick, Leigh E. Nystrom, Kate Fissell, Cameron S. Carter and Jonathan Cohen covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (324 citations) and Social Psychology (193 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/46035.