Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/45159 →Countries where authors are citing Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration
This map shows the geographic impact of Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration
This network shows the impact of Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration.
About Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration
This paper, published in 1999, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Gentry N. Patrick, Lawrence Zukerberg, Margareta Nikolić, Suzanne de la Monte, Pieter Dikkes and Li‐Huei Tsai covering the research area of Oncology, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (707 citations), Physiology (516 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (405 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/45159.