Prion (PrPSc)-specific epitope defined by a monoclonal antibody
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/36337 →Countries where authors are citing Prion (PrPSc)-specific epitope defined by a monoclonal antibody
This map shows the geographic impact of Prion (PrPSc)-specific epitope defined by a monoclonal antibody. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prion (PrPSc)-specific epitope defined by a monoclonal antibody with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prion (PrPSc)-specific epitope defined by a monoclonal antibody more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Prion (PrPSc)-specific epitope defined by a monoclonal antibody
This network shows the impact of Prion (PrPSc)-specific epitope defined by a monoclonal antibody. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Prion (PrPSc)-specific epitope defined by a monoclonal antibody.
About Prion (PrPSc)-specific epitope defined by a monoclonal antibody
This paper, published in 1997, received 452 indexed citations . Written by Carsten Korth, P. Streit, Markus Moser, R. Fischer, Walter Schulz‐Schaeffer, H. A. Kretzschmar, Alex J. Raeber, U. Braun, F. Ehrensperger and Simone Hornemann covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Nutrition and Dietetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (438 citations), Neurology (198 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (175 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/36337.