Spin domains in ground-state Bose–Einstein condensates

876 indexed citations
published 1998

Countries where authors are citing Spin domains in ground-state Bose–Einstein condensates

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Spin domains in ground-state Bose–Einstein condensates. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Spin domains in ground-state Bose–Einstein condensates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spin domains in ground-state Bose–Einstein condensates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Spin domains in ground-state Bose–Einstein condensates

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Spin domains in ground-state Bose–Einstein condensates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Spin domains in ground-state Bose–Einstein condensates.

About Spin domains in ground-state Bose–Einstein condensates

This paper, published in 1998, received 876 indexed citations . Written by J. Stenger, S. Inouye, Dan Stamper-Kurn, H.‐J. Miesner, A. P. Chikkatur and Wolfgang Ketterle covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (866 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (235 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (88 citations). Published in Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/24567.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026