Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity
- Journal
- Nature Structural Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/2338 →Countries where authors are citing Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity
This map shows the geographic impact of Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity
This network shows the impact of Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity.
About Crystal structure of botulinum neurotoxin type A and implications for toxicity
This paper, published in 1998, received 569 indexed citations . Written by D. Borden Lacy, William H. Tepp, A Cohen, Bibhuti R. DasGupta and Raymond C. Stevens covering the research area of Neurology, Immunology and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Neurology (498 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (276 citations) and Molecular Biology (180 citations). Published in Nature Structural Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/2338.