Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor-α are resistant to skin carcinogenesis
- Journal
- Nature Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/10552 →Countries where authors are citing Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor-α are resistant to skin carcinogenesis
This map shows the geographic impact of Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor-α are resistant to skin carcinogenesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor-α are resistant to skin carcinogenesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor-α are resistant to skin carcinogenesis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor-α are resistant to skin carcinogenesis
This network shows the impact of Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor-α are resistant to skin carcinogenesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor-α are resistant to skin carcinogenesis.
About Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor-α are resistant to skin carcinogenesis
This paper, published in 1999, received 700 indexed citations . Written by Robert J. Moore, David M. Owens, Gordon Stamp, Caroline H. Arnott, Frances Burke, N East, Barrett J. Rollins, Manolis Pasparakis, George Kollias and Frances R. Balkwill covering the research area of Immunology and Cancer Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Immunology (352 citations), Oncology (289 citations) and Molecular Biology (252 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/10552.