Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment
- Journal
- Journal of Proteome Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/pr101065j →Countries where authors are citing Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment
This map shows the geographic impact of Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment
This network shows the impact of Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment.
About Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment
This paper, published in 2011, received 4.1k indexed citations . Written by Jürgen Cox, Nadin Neuhauser, Annette Michalski, Richard A. Scheltema, Jesper V. Olsen and Matthias Mann covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (2.9k citations), Spectroscopy (940 citations) and Cell Biology (467 citations). Published in Journal of Proteome Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/pr101065j.