Size-dependent Photoconductivity in MBE-Grown GaN−Nanowires
- Journal
- Nano Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/nl0500306 →Countries where authors are citing Size-dependent Photoconductivity in MBE-Grown GaN−Nanowires
This map shows the geographic impact of Size-dependent Photoconductivity in MBE-Grown GaN−Nanowires. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Size-dependent Photoconductivity in MBE-Grown GaN−Nanowires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Size-dependent Photoconductivity in MBE-Grown GaN−Nanowires more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Size-dependent Photoconductivity in MBE-Grown GaN−Nanowires
This network shows the impact of Size-dependent Photoconductivity in MBE-Grown GaN−Nanowires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Size-dependent Photoconductivity in MBE-Grown GaN−Nanowires.
About Size-dependent Photoconductivity in MBE-Grown GaN−Nanowires
This paper, published in 2005, received 490 indexed citations . Written by Raffaella Calarco, M. Marso, T. Richter, R. Meijers, A. van der Hart, T. Stoïca and H. Lüth covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (297 citations), Biomedical Engineering (248 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (240 citations). Published in Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl0500306.