Gallium Nitride-Based Nanowire Radial Heterostructures for Nanophotonics

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 527 indexed citations. Written by Fang Qian, Yat Li, Silvija Gradečak, Deli Wang, Carl J. Barrelet and Charles M. Lieber covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (316 citations), Biomedical Engineering (305 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (271 citations). Published in Nano Letters.

Countries where authors are citing Gallium Nitride-Based Nanowire Radial Heterostructures for Nanophotonics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gallium Nitride-Based Nanowire Radial Heterostructures for Nanophotonics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gallium Nitride-Based Nanowire Radial Heterostructures for Nanophotonics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gallium Nitride-Based Nanowire Radial Heterostructures for Nanophotonics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Gallium Nitride-Based Nanowire Radial Heterostructures for Nanophotonics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Gallium Nitride-Based Nanowire Radial Heterostructures for Nanophotonics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gallium Nitride-Based Nanowire Radial Heterostructures for Nanophotonics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/nl0487774.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026