Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Monodisperse Latex Particles: Effects of Particle Size
- Authors
- B. P. BinksSimon O. Lumsdon
- Journal
- Langmuir
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/la0103822 →Countries where authors are citing Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Monodisperse Latex Particles: Effects of Particle Size
This map shows the geographic impact of Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Monodisperse Latex Particles: Effects of Particle Size. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Monodisperse Latex Particles: Effects of Particle Size with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Monodisperse Latex Particles: Effects of Particle Size more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Monodisperse Latex Particles: Effects of Particle Size
This network shows the impact of Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Monodisperse Latex Particles: Effects of Particle Size. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Monodisperse Latex Particles: Effects of Particle Size.
About Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Monodisperse Latex Particles: Effects of Particle Size
This paper, published in 2001, received 670 indexed citations . Written by B. P. Binks and Simon O. Lumsdon covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Food Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (617 citations), Food Science (381 citations) and Organic Chemistry (363 citations). Published in Langmuir.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/la0103822.