Morphology of flame-generated soot as determined by thermophoretic sampling

425 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1987, received 425 indexed citations. Written by Richard A. Dobbins and Constantine M. Megaridis covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Mechanics (197 citations), Atmospheric Science (197 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (180 citations). Published in Langmuir.

Countries where authors are citing Morphology of flame-generated soot as determined by thermophoretic sampling

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Morphology of flame-generated soot as determined by thermophoretic sampling. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morphology of flame-generated soot as determined by thermophoretic sampling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morphology of flame-generated soot as determined by thermophoretic sampling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Morphology of flame-generated soot as determined by thermophoretic sampling

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Morphology of flame-generated soot as determined by thermophoretic sampling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Morphology of flame-generated soot as determined by thermophoretic sampling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/la00074a019.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026