Wavelength-Scanned Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jp050508u →Countries where authors are citing Wavelength-Scanned Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy
This map shows the geographic impact of Wavelength-Scanned Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wavelength-Scanned Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wavelength-Scanned Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Wavelength-Scanned Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy
This network shows the impact of Wavelength-Scanned Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Wavelength-Scanned Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy.
About Wavelength-Scanned Surface-Enhanced Raman Excitation Spectroscopy
This paper, published in 2005, received 826 indexed citations . Written by Adam D. McFarland, Matthew A. Young, Jon A. Dieringer and Richard P. Van Duyne covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (738 citations), Biomedical Engineering (510 citations) and Materials Chemistry (298 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jp050508u.