Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers: a decision-tree hybrid

826 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 826 indexed citations. Written by Ron Kohavi covering the research area of Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (585 citations), Information Systems (232 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (94 citations). Published in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w6893288 →

Countries where authors are citing Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers: a decision-tree hybrid

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers: a decision-tree hybrid. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers: a decision-tree hybrid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers: a decision-tree hybrid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers: a decision-tree hybrid

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers: a decision-tree hybrid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers: a decision-tree hybrid.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w6893288.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026