Flash Reduction and Patterning of Graphite Oxide and Its Polymer Composite
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja902348k →Countries where authors are citing Flash Reduction and Patterning of Graphite Oxide and Its Polymer Composite
This map shows the geographic impact of Flash Reduction and Patterning of Graphite Oxide and Its Polymer Composite. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flash Reduction and Patterning of Graphite Oxide and Its Polymer Composite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flash Reduction and Patterning of Graphite Oxide and Its Polymer Composite more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Flash Reduction and Patterning of Graphite Oxide and Its Polymer Composite
This network shows the impact of Flash Reduction and Patterning of Graphite Oxide and Its Polymer Composite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Flash Reduction and Patterning of Graphite Oxide and Its Polymer Composite.
About Flash Reduction and Patterning of Graphite Oxide and Its Polymer Composite
This paper, published in 2009, received 773 indexed citations . Written by Laura J. Cote, Rodolfo Cruz‐Silva and Jiaxing Huang covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (565 citations), Biomedical Engineering (424 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (289 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja902348k.