Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja800073m →Countries where authors are citing Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K
This map shows the geographic impact of Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K
This network shows the impact of Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K.
About Iron-Based Layered Superconductor La[O1-xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K
This paper, published in 2008, received 6.0k indexed citations . Written by Yoichi Kamihara, Takumi Watanabe, Masahiro Hirano and Hideo Hosono covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Accounting and Condensed Matter Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (5.7k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (4.3k citations) and Accounting (1.8k citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja800073m.