Distortion/Interaction Energy Control of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactivity
- Authors
- Daniel H. EssK. N. Houk
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja0734086 →Countries where authors are citing Distortion/Interaction Energy Control of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactivity
This map shows the geographic impact of Distortion/Interaction Energy Control of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactivity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Distortion/Interaction Energy Control of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactivity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Distortion/Interaction Energy Control of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactivity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Distortion/Interaction Energy Control of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactivity
This network shows the impact of Distortion/Interaction Energy Control of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactivity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Distortion/Interaction Energy Control of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactivity.
About Distortion/Interaction Energy Control of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactivity
This paper, published in 2007, received 853 indexed citations . Written by Daniel H. Ess and K. N. Houk covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (760 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (178 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (109 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja0734086.