Bright Fluorescent Nanodiamonds: No Photobleaching and Low Cytotoxicity
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja0567081 →Countries where authors are citing Bright Fluorescent Nanodiamonds: No Photobleaching and Low Cytotoxicity
This map shows the geographic impact of Bright Fluorescent Nanodiamonds: No Photobleaching and Low Cytotoxicity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bright Fluorescent Nanodiamonds: No Photobleaching and Low Cytotoxicity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bright Fluorescent Nanodiamonds: No Photobleaching and Low Cytotoxicity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Bright Fluorescent Nanodiamonds: No Photobleaching and Low Cytotoxicity
This network shows the impact of Bright Fluorescent Nanodiamonds: No Photobleaching and Low Cytotoxicity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Bright Fluorescent Nanodiamonds: No Photobleaching and Low Cytotoxicity.
About Bright Fluorescent Nanodiamonds: No Photobleaching and Low Cytotoxicity
This paper, published in 2005, received 795 indexed citations . Written by Amy S. Yu, Huan‐Cheng Chang, Kuan-Ming Chen and Yueh‐Chung Yu covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (710 citations), Biomedical Engineering (279 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (128 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja0567081.