Lanthanum complexes of spheroidal carbon shells
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja00311a102 →Countries where authors are citing Lanthanum complexes of spheroidal carbon shells
This map shows the geographic impact of Lanthanum complexes of spheroidal carbon shells. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lanthanum complexes of spheroidal carbon shells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lanthanum complexes of spheroidal carbon shells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Lanthanum complexes of spheroidal carbon shells
This network shows the impact of Lanthanum complexes of spheroidal carbon shells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Lanthanum complexes of spheroidal carbon shells.
About Lanthanum complexes of spheroidal carbon shells
This paper, published in 1985, received 964 indexed citations . Written by J. R. Heath, Sean C. O’Brien, R. F. Curl, Frank K. Tittel and R. E. Smalley covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (867 citations), Materials Chemistry (808 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (246 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja00311a102.