Behavior of Ylides Containing N, O, and C Atoms as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ja0017864 →Countries where authors are citing Behavior of Ylides Containing N, O, and C Atoms as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors
This map shows the geographic impact of Behavior of Ylides Containing N, O, and C Atoms as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Behavior of Ylides Containing N, O, and C Atoms as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behavior of Ylides Containing N, O, and C Atoms as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Behavior of Ylides Containing N, O, and C Atoms as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors
This network shows the impact of Behavior of Ylides Containing N, O, and C Atoms as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Behavior of Ylides Containing N, O, and C Atoms as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors.
About Behavior of Ylides Containing N, O, and C Atoms as Hydrogen Bond Acceptors
This paper, published in 2000, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Isabel Rozas, Ibón Alkorta and José Elguero covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (710 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (645 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (320 citations). Published in Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ja0017864.