Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states

2.2k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1992, received 2.2k indexed citations. Written by James B. Foresman, Martin Head‐Gordon, John A. Pople and Michael J. Frisch covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (964 citations) and Materials Chemistry (567 citations). Published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Toward a systematic molecular orbital theory for excited states.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/j100180a030.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026