The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications
- Authors
- Luna B. LeopoldThomas Maddock
- Journal
- USGS professional paper
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3133/pp252 →Countries where authors are citing The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications
This map shows the geographic impact of The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications
This network shows the impact of The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications.
About The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications
This paper, published in 1953, received 2.2k indexed citations . Written by Luna B. Leopold and Thomas Maddock covering the research area of Civil and Structural Engineering, Ecology and Environmental Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (1.6k citations), Water Science and Technology (1.2k citations) and Soil Science (824 citations). Published in USGS professional paper.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3133/pp252.